There’s no podcast better than Redhanded. I learn something new about history, politics, science . But the best part is that the presenters don’t go on and on about themselves.

I appreciate how the hosts structure stories in most cases and they have particularly nice voices but they have some pretty bad, uninformed takes at some points. Maybe a handful times an episode they’ll either have a random aside or hot take on the case that make no sense and are sometimes even rude

I’m really grateful for the high quality content and especially the vulgar language. Since I’m not you know a child or so uptight I clutch pearls into dust I really prefer my podcasts talk to me like a friend. If I wanna be lied to and talked to like a child I’ll hit up Fox News. Thank god these women are badasses and keep us entertained.

Y’all are amazing. Who ever thought listening to True Crime could be soothing. Y’all’s voices are so soothing y’all are funny love the banter why did it take me so long to find y’all keep doing this!!! Gotta give a shout out to the Morbid Girls for having you on I would have never known this is where I am supposed to be I really wish I could give you all 10 stars love yall soooo much

The content is very interesting, however the vulgar language is not necessary, unfollowing today

Why can’t these ladies(I use loosely) own up to being wrong! They should admit when they are wrong and more on. I would come back to listening but can’t get past there bad character

One of the more attractive features of RedHanded has been the intelligent, creative and interesting content. Unfortunately there seem to be more and more painfully one-sided interruptions as of late that come across as painfully arrogant and are truly off-putting. You’re better and smarter than that!

I like the show, it’s honestly good. There’s too much of the f-word unfortunately, and they don’t seem to like the USA very much. Suruthi can reeeeeally monologue. I hit fast-forward literally 6 times and she was still going. They can be funny though, so hopefully it doesn’t wear on me.

I’ve never left a review on a podcast before, but I feel compelled to write this… while I love your topics and find your shows very well written and your voices very pleasing to listen to, your habit of whispering all the important information you want to emphasize while turning up the volume on the commercials, makes it impossible for me to enjoy your show unless I keep one hand on my phone to adjust the sound continually. I can’t believe I’m alone in having this reaction to your delivery, and as I don’t have time to do this, you’ve just lost me as a listener. Just sign me sad and unhappy and frustrated.

The best true crime podcast around. The hosts bring the perfect amount of levity.

I find it hard to get a steady volume to hear these gals. They seem to try and build tension for a story, but then finish sentences so quietly I cannot hear what they’re saying. Overall I usually like their stories, but it drives me crazy to constantly turn the volume up and down.

What a lazy podcast. They did bare minimum research on the Karen Read Case & form a ridiculous opinion on it. Karen Read did not kill John. Watch the trial ya know research. Here are some facts for you 1. The FBI hired car reconstruction specialists that conclude John was 100% not hit by a car and are investigating DA in canton 2. The house owners a Boston cop but never came outside after John was found on the lawn and police lights blaring outside & Karen screaming even with their dog who barks incessantly usually. Police never went into the house. 3. Jen McCabe 1000% google searched "hos long to die in the cold" at 2:27am before John's body was found and deleted it & was she also caught lieing dozens of time on the stand. See video 4. Snow plow driver saw no body on the lawn the two times he came by in middle of night only a Ford edge the Albert's drive. 5. Higgins & Albert both destroyed their phones the day before they were supposed to be turned in to evidence 6. They used solo cups and grocery bags to collect evidence contaminating everything. 7. John had blunt force trauma back if head and dog bites on his arms but no bruising below the neck impossible for a car hitting a pedestrian. 8 the dog Chloe had a history of biting people and was rehomed before they could investigate. 9. Police never collected ring footage from anyone with cameras on Fairview. 10. Lead investigator wrote disgusting texts about Karen looking for nudes in Karen's phone calling her vile names like c@nt and said she should kill herself. 11. Lead investigator is on non paid leave for his unethical behavior and is friends with the people framing Karen & group texted private details to people about case. 12. 18 supposed butt dial calls between the group framing Karen they also deleted. 13. They inverted the video in the sally port showing them messing with the tailight. 14. The judge is so biased it should be illegal doesnt let you give reasons for objections favors prosecutor 15. Blood & vomit on John's boxers but not on pants or shirt. 16. No blood on car at all. 17. The initial statements by cops says John was in a fight. 18. 360 app proves witness's lieing about locations in timeline. 19. Karen connects to WiFi at John's house at the time prosecutors claim she was at 34 Fairview hitting John. 20. Sooo much corruption etc etc etc etc.

Wow. When my sister shared this with me, I didn’t realize id want you to be in my ears at any chance I got. Thank you for hundreds of amazing episodes!! Your scripts are amazing.

Out of the Otto Warmbier episode, I learned that these two British women don’t like Americans flying American flags, white supremacy goes hand in hand with flag flying, they don’t like how Donald Trump handled the case, etc. This isn’t why I tuned into this podcast. I just wanted to learn more about this heartbreaking story without all of the preachy lecturing. Is this how Wondery feels about the USA and its people?

New listener as of a week or two and I’m hooked! I’m going through the episodes so fast, I love their voices, how easy it is to listen to them, excellent research and their personalities make it all tied together in a beautiful little bow. Keep it up ladies, I’m a huge fan!

I just discovered these ladies and I’m obsessed! Witty with F bombs, my love language.

Love it !!!!

The episodes are entertaining enough, but research and journalistic integrity are lacking.

Long-time listener, first-time reviewer—love the podcast! That said, I’ve noticed the audio levels are a bit uneven. The episode volume, especially Suruthi’s voice, is often so low that I have trouble hearing clearly, while the commercials come on much louder in comparison. It’d be great if this could be balanced out for a smoother listening experience. Keep up the great work!

I have been listening to the podcast and enjoying it. However, the Holy Grail episode had 2 obvious mistakes. 1. Transmutation is not a catholic belief. Podcast mentions it is a Christian belief but not a Catholic one. It is one of the most important premises of Catholicism so not sure how was this not known if research was adequately done. 2. Joseph of Arimatea is not the husband of the Virgin Mary who raised Jesus.He donated the tomb where Jesus was put to rest and is believed to have been related to Mary but not St Joseph. Minor things that bother me as to the level of effort put into putting together an episode.

My rating and review, like all the ratings and reviews, are just my personal opinion. Personally, I really dislike podcasts where the hosts just start ripping and joking, and talking to each other as friends and inside jokes throughout the podcast story. I’m listening to them to hear the story, not to hear them crack jokes with each other about their past lives or friendships or whatever. And there’s a ton of that in this podcast, so I don’t like this podcast that’s the reason. Not saying the content isn’t good, just that I don’t like the presentation.

Really enjoy the show. Can the producers please adjust the volume levels before publishing? Commercials are so loud compared to the show itself. Even during the show levels aren’t consistent.

It feels like the hosts, or host (Hannah) spends a lot of time slagging off other countries and cultures. So far I’ve heard her express negativity for, Sweden, Wales, USA and the Neatherlands and I’ve only listened to 3 episodes 😂 We get it you’re super proud to be English. But I’m sure she’d say I’m just getting my ‘panties in a bunch’.

Part 1 of Jim Jones could have been reduced to ten minutes and out into the other episode. Also, you guys definitely should have watched the Jon Benet Netflix documentary before you produced your JB show because in light of that doc, the ep sounds really misinformed and overlooks a lot of new info that was clarified through the doc.

To those leaving snarky or rude comments: let’s take a moment to appreciate what this podcast truly is. RedHanded is Hannah and Suruthi’s show—a platform for them to share their thoughts, opinions, and storytelling style. We tune in because we value their work, not to demand they censor themselves, cater to every individual experience, or produce episodes that address every possible angle in painstaking detail. The way they research, record, and edit is a reflection of their creative process—it’s their art. Constructive criticism is fine, but there’s a clear line between offering thoughtful feedback and being unnecessarily harsh. Ask yourself: has tearing someone down ever been productive? Hannah and Suruthi are exceptionally talented—intelligent, witty, articulate, and their chemistry is what makes the show so compelling. Let’s show them the respect they deserve for the immense effort they pour into creating something remarkable for their audience. From one listener to another, with love, Ash in New Mexico

I have been a HUGE fan of True Crime media of all sorts for most of my life. Books, TV shows, documentaries… You name it. I’m only on episode 17 (so all of he way back up n 2017)… and I am HOOKED!!! This is so much fun to listen to! You guys do incredible research and provide so many details about every case you talk about while also providing so much fun and personal commentary. I feel like I understand so much about the personalities of the two incredible host of the show despite never having personally met them: that’s how personable and charming they are as hosts. Keep the morbid fun coming, ladies; from now on, I will ALWAYS be here to listen!

I used to love this podcast but after their blatant misinformation and irresponsible coverage of the Richard Allen conviction and JonBenet Ramsey case, they’ve lost all credibility for me. I’m unsubscribing

As women from England, you would think you both understood how awful tabloids are- as you criticize the British tabloids openly throughout your show. But your jon benet Ramsey episode proved to me how insensitive you are. She’s a little girl, you did no real research and you further circulated the American tabloids continuous false narratives that harmed the path to justice for a 6 year old girl. I hadn’t gotten back to 2019 in your catalogue, and I won’t. It’s your responsibility on your platform to put out the truth when you choose topics like “ TRUE crime” as the basis of said platform.

This is my first episode & I am BEWILDERED as to how this is a wondery podcast. The information they cover isn’t even accurate, they’re cynical & assume quite a bit based on their own pre-determined bias. I don’t know who did it, and so I’m not reviewing them based on disagreement, but instead irresponsible coverage of a case that’s packed with information readily available to anyone who takes a second to search. I was excited to have potentially found a new podcast, but with true crime being an over saturated I don’t see why anyone would waste their time listening to people just spew their own personal views and incorrect info.

Y’all should be ashamed of yourselves for your disgraceful coverage of the Karen read case that was riddled with blatant lies, misinformation, and spinning facts to fit your biased narrative against her! I was a long time listener until this show now I will never listen again. After realizing how wrong you were in this case, I went back and listened to some other episodes of cases I knew well, and when I did, I realized y’all have been getting a lot of key details wrong or spinning info to fit your agenda. Shame on you, do better!! 🤬 Wow these imbeciles did the same thing with the Delphi case even after they received feedback from their fans that they needed to do a better job of researching and presenting cases in an unbiased manner. Constructive criticism is an opportunity to learn and grow. Yikes!

I couldn’t get through the first ten minutes. Their foul mouths were gross and over the top.

Great rapport with the hosts, great storytellers! And I love the logic - has made me rethink some of my firm convictions on past true crime stories! Thank you!

You are the tops, and your posh accents send me straight to heaven. However, I had to study the comfort women of WWII in college and it made me so enraged and sad that I will have to skip that episode, sorry. Can’t do it. The rest of the episodes I am gobbling up nom nom nom (yes it’s weird, but not really, that i can listen to your murder-y ones, but not the comfort women- which was a mass atrocity against the innocent). You are consummate storytellers. Update: Why are you being so negative about familial DNA databases? It’s solving crimes, giving families closure, and giving John and Jane Does their identities back! What a weird position to go off on after an episode where that technology helped solve a mystery and a series of crimes. Newsflash: Your phone creates way more privacy and identity intrusion than DNA ever could. I’m pretty annoyed. Knocked your rating from 5 stars. Back to 5 stars. I heart you both. Update: had to knock it down to 4 because of the significant inaccuracies in the Alcala episode. I actually had to stop listening to the episode, which I’ve never had to do with Red-Handed before. Examples- Steve Hodel is the son, not grandson, of the notorious Dr Hodel, and Steve was not the eagle-eyed person who saw the abduction of little Tali Shapiro, but a civilian Good Samaritan.

I never questioned the information in this podcast (or read the reviews), until listening to the Delphi murder trial verdict episode. Much of the information presented was factually incorrect, which would be shown by reading the trial documents, including those from the three day hearing where the defense presented evidence for the Odinism theory, which was found to be unsubstantiated and therefore not admissible during trial. Obviously opinions may vary, but many of their opinions are not based on the actual evidence presented by both sides, or the events and testimony from hearings and the trial. (I do however agree that the true crime fan psychologist should not be practicing in the criminal justice system, let alone treating a suspect in a notorious case!) So now I’m wondering what other episodes are factually incorrect?! I generally agree with their interpretations and opinions, but how many of them are based on wrong information? I see some other reviews subsequent to their Karen Read trial coverage, which I did not listen to or read about from any source, so perhaps that was another misinformed take? I previously believed this was the best true crime podcast, where information was imparted in a mostly unbiased way regardless of the expressed opinions, but I’m sad to now question what I’ve been hearing! Using true crime stories as entertainment is something I’m personally conflicted about. Why am I so interested? Am I just a prurient gossip? I soothe my qualms by at least seeking out the facts and evidence, listening to or reading either primary sources or those whose information is from primary sources. I thought Red Handed was such a podcast, but I don’t know anymore, although can’t quite bring myself to give one star. Used to be all the stars :(

Such disappointing “reporting” compared to what Red Handed was early on. Now it’s all about how dramatic poor Hannah can make her whispering. This irresponsible coverage for money and clicks is so shameful and disrespectful to the actual victims and their families. Shame on you both. And stop whining about podcast awards. Red Handed is just another Wikipedia of true crime, with no original reporting. You have a very, very easy job.

I’ve been a Redhanded listener for years. However, the recent episode discussing the Delphi verdict was absolutely the most misinformed piece of trash I’ve ever heard. Do your research. There was more than enough evidence to convict Richard Allen. There is no other reasonable conclusion based on the evidence. Unfollowing and questioning everything I’ve ever heard you say.

I’ve been a long time listener. Years. Over the years I’ve found a lot of the information to be factually incorrect on different cases and stories. Y’all’s coverage on the Delphi case was terrible. I’m so disappointed. Please make sure your information is coming from reputable sources. Do your own research and don’t state others opinions as facts. I live 2 hours from Delphi. I’ve followed the case closely… your podcast coverage on the case was ridiculously false.

A long time listener who is just horrified by your coverage of Richard Allen. You don’t address the actual evidence. Good job supporting a child murderer. I will never listen again.

Don’t waste your time

This Delphi trial recap had maybe the most examples of the Mandela effect I've ever heard packed into 30 minutes. This is mostly not the hosts fault exactly, but, still so frustrating. Unfortunately, due to the gag order combined with the lack of televised coverage of the trial, 99.9% of things reported in this episode are not true but are still commonly misreported. For example: although much was made by reporters on the day that the FBI agent witness was told he could not testify via Zoom, there wasn't much coverage to correct the record when he did testify days later in person. Because the agent didn't have any information that helped the defense, his testimony wasn't a big deal, so it passed by quietly even though it was a huge news topic days earlier. Second example: the white van detail was not in discovery before RA's confession that mentioned it because it wasn't relevant to the case until RA brought it up in his confession. Meaning-RA could not have learned abt the white van by reviewing his discovery. This is another fact that is maybe misunderstood and so, once again, heavily misreported. There are way too many more examples to explain them all here (like the American legal standard for introducing an alternative theory at trial, and how the defense did not remotely meet the standard. No mistake was made there either). There will not be a successful appeal in the Delphi case. Not even close. The circumstantial case against RA was overwhelming and very well done. It's really unfortunate that so much of it is confused and misreported. This makes me feel even more terrible for the victims' families. After everything they've been through, they now have to deal with so many people getting so many things about the case wrong. Upsetting. Don't run to your microphone to do a podcast maybe if you don't actually know any facts. Just a thought.

These 2 just put out a whole episode in support of Richard Allen, the man found guilty in the Delphi murders. I cannot listen to this podcast anymore. Two girls were brutally murdered by this man, and they support the killer. I used to listen but I unsubscribed. This is the final straw for me. So sick.

Great stories and the hosts are amazing. Informative, witty and entertaining. Never miss an episode 👍

Cannot believe this show is still around. 🤣 it’s not good. You’re also liars and on the wrong side of history. I did like you but now you have lost me forever. I will spread the word to anyone I hear who likes your show about your lies. Your words live forever on the internet!! How’s your good friend Patrick? Yikes aligned yourself with the wrong group didn’t you. You actually chose Patrick over more friends, more money, and more fame. You lose haha

but what WAS that halloween special? as a fellow oct 29 scorpio im disappoint.

The Eddie Lee Sexton ending was epic! I agree that it's the best so far

Love, love, love the show, but please turn up your microphones, I can barely hear Hannah half the time, and then the ads come on extra loud.

This podcast used to be one of my favorites until they sold their soul to Wondery. I miss the shorthands but not enough to pay for them. 2/3 of their episodes are in Wondery. I also don’t like the way they gloss over things such as beastiality. It’s disgusting.

Enjoyed the show until I got to a case I knew extremely well. That’s when I realized they are speaking with such confidence even when their facts are entirely wrong. Impossible impossible to listen to them discuss critical facts of the case and just have undeniably bad information.

Love you ladies - you’re fantastic and my fave true crime listen for over a year now. Just please stop whispering!! The audio volume swings are hard to handle and I feel like I’m missing things 😘

I’ve listened to the hosts talk about a few cases I was familiar with and while they are engaging, they get a lot details incorrect or leave out information that doesn’t go with their theories. Again, they are great to listen to but you can’t trust that what they present as fact is fact. For the more well known cases, I just don’t understand how they are so inaccurate.